“Dormant securitiesâ€: Imperial guarantees for colonial loans, 1842-1934

Rui Esteves and Ali Coskun Tuncer

No 19267, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Contemporaries and historians agree that British colonies did not borrow on their own credit but on imperial fiat. We explore the history of colonial bonds explicitly guaranteed by Britain to qualify this assertion. We find that markets priced guarantees above other colonial bonds and that colonial governments lobbied for them. The introduction of other regulatory enhancements reduced the value of guarantees in the late 19th century, but it recovered in the interwar. British authorities were ambivalent about guarantees—worrying about creating moral hazard while using guarantees to lower the costs of developmental and strategic projects in the colonies.

Keywords: Loan; guarantees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F54 H81 N20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19267 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19267

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19267

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().