From the Convent to Hollywood: The Legacy of Spanish and American Rule in the Philippines

Leticia Arroyo Abad, Jose-Antonio Espin-Sanchez and Noel Maurer

No 19535, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The Philippine Islands experienced two radically different colonial regimes: the Spanish Empire and the United States. These two regimes, however, had two points in common. First, both occupied the Philippines due to the islands' strategic location, and both were sorely disappointed by that decision. Second, both nations solved the "imperial trilemma" -- the trade-off between settlement, control, and economic exploitation -- by jettisoning metropolitan settlement and exploitation. Despite those similarities, however, the effects of the two regimes on the Philippines were radically different. The Philippines as we know it would not exist without the Spanish empire, whereas the long-term impacts of the American period (other than the English language) is at best unclear. The Americans under-resourced their reform efforts and sabotaged many of their own accomplishments in a rush to decolonize after 1935, for reasons of domestic American politics, not Filipino nationalism.

Date: 2024-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19535 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19535

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP19535

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().