Geopolitical Conflict and Trade: Montesquieu Revisited

Jonas Adolph, Wilhelm Kohler and Müller, Gernot

No 20885, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We develop a simple model that jointly determines the level of trade and the extent of trade-disruption risk associated with geopolitical conflict. Any pair of countries is likely to settle into one of two steady states: (i) a low level of trade coupled with high trade-disruption risk, or (ii) a high level of trade coupled with low trade-disruption risk. Intermediate cases are unstable. Examining bilateral trade flows between 1966 and 2015, we find, first, that the extent of trade varies systematically with trade-disruption risk and, second, that trade between country pairs tends to converge over time toward these polar cases.

Keywords: Sourcing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20885 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20885

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20885

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().