The Factor Bias of External Inputs: Implications for Substitution between Capital and Labor

Dimitrije Ruzic

No 21591, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper reevaluates the longstanding debate on capital-labor substitution by examining the role of external inputs: raw materials, intermediate goods and services, imports, offshoring. Both a meta-analysis (analyzing existing estimates of substitution) and direct estimation (using U.S. data for 1963-2016) indicate that external inputs disproportionately displace labor. These findings imply (1) that the capital-labor ratio responds 40-80% more strongly to the price of labor than to the price of capital, (2) that value added cannot be modeled separably from gross output, and (3) that historical disagreements regarding substitution can be recast as an omitted variable bias involving external inputs.

Keywords: Capital-labor substitution; Production; Trade; Non-separability; Intermediate inputs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E23 F16 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP21591 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21591

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP21591

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().