 Expected Utility Maximization and the Optimal Portfolio of Risky AssetsKarl Whelan No 21926, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research Abstract: Classic finance theory advises investors to hold a mix of the risk-free asset and a single portfolio of risky assets: the tangency portfolio that maximizes the Sharpe ratio. Two questions about this ad- vice have remained largely unresolved. Is holding this specific portfolio approximately consistent with expected utility maximization? And if so, what determines how much of it to hold? Existing derivations typically assume either Normally distributed returns or quadratic utility. This paper answers both questions using a second-order expansion of a general concave utility function, without either restriction. The resulting portfolio is exactly proportional to the tangency portfolio, scaled by a term that depends on the maximum Sharpe ratio of the investment opportunity set. The approximation is highly accurate: a fourth-order correction, solved exactly for a two-asset opportunity set and numerically for a ten-asset one, changes portfolio composition only modestly, and the solution captures at least 95% of the achievable utility gain, relative to the numerically optimal CRRA portfolio, over a naive benchmark matched to the same overall risky/risk-free split. Keywords: Optimal; portfolios (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21926 Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.