Objectivity, Proximity and Adaptability in Corporate Governance

Arnoud Boot and Jonathon Macey

No 2257, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Countries appear to differ considerably in the basic orientations of their corporate governance structures. We postulate the trade-off between objectivity and proximity as fundamental to the corporate governance debate. We stress the value of objectivity that comes with distance (e.g. the market oriented U.S. system), and the value of better information that comes with proximity (e.g. the more intrusive Continental European model). A superior corporate governance arrangement must balance the benefits of proximity and objectivity. In this context, we also discuss the ways in which investors have "contracted around" the flaws in their own corporate governance systems, pointing at the adaptability of different arrangements.

Keywords: Comparative Financial Systems; Corporate Governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G3 K2 P5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=2257 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Objectivity, Proximity and Adaptability in Corporate Governance (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2257

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=2257

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().