 Does Time Inconsistency Matter?Paul Levine () No 227, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research Abstract: The paper addresses the Kydland and Prescott (1977) argument that the optimal policy in models with rational expectations is time-inconsistent. This, it is argued, undermines the credibility of the optimal policy in the eyes of the private sector, who will expect the policy-maker to reoptimize. Therefore policy, if it is to be credible, must be constrained to be time-consistent. For many models, this is a serious constraint. Barro and Gordon offer a different approach to the time inconsistency problem. They assume that policy-makers suffer a loss of reputation if they renege on earlier commitments. With this "punishment" mechanism in place, Barro and Gordon show that there exist policies superior to the time-consistent policy which are credible and sustainable. The Barro-Gordon analysis is, however, model-specific and, in particular, applies only to static models. The main purpose of this paper is to show how their analysis can be generalized to any rational expectations model with structural dynamics and stochastic exogenous shocks. Keywords: Credibility; Rational Expectations; Reputation; Time Consistency (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:227 Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.