The Capital Levy in Theory and Practice

Barry Eichengreen

No 350, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper shows how in theory, if the contingencies in response to which it is imposed are fully anticipated, independently verifiable and not under government control, then saving and investment should not fall following the imposition of a capital levy. Nor should the government find it more difficult to raise revenues subsequently, even if its non-recurrence cannot be guaranteed. In practice, however, serious problems stand in the way of implementation. Property owners are sure to delay its adoption and engage in capital flight, reducing the prospective yield and allowing the special circumstances providing the justification for the levy to recede into the past.

Keywords: Capital Flight; Capital Taxation; Government Spending (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=350 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Capital Levy in Theory and Practice (1989)
Working Paper: The Capital Levy in Theory and Practice (1989)
Working Paper: The Capital Levy in Theory and Practice (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:350

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... pers/dp.php?dpno=350

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().