Top Research Productivity and its Persistence

Reinhilde Veugelers and Stijn Kelchtermans

No 5415, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The paper contributes to the debate on cumulative advantage effects in academic research by examining top performance in research and its persistence over time, using a panel dataset comprising the publications of biomedical and exact scientists at the KU Leuven in the period 1992-2001. We study the selection of researchers into productivity categories and analyse how they switch between these categories over time. About 25% achieves top performance at least once, while 5% is persistently top. Analysing the hazard to first and subsequent top performance shows strong support for an accumulative process. Rank, gender, hierarchical position and past performance are highly significant explanatory factors.

Keywords: Economics of science; Research productivity; Hazard models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 L31 O31 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse, nep-eff, nep-ino, nep-lab, nep-sog and nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5415 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5415

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5415

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().