How to increase the impact of clinical guidelines on medical practice

M. Verstraete

European Review, 2002, vol. 10, issue 4, 545-553

Abstract: Clinical guidelines are not implemented in a simple linear way, their integration in clinical practice is an evolving process influenced by the doctor, the patient and society. Methodologically, it is not easy to evaluate definitively the impact of guidelines. The overall appraisal yields a pessimistic conclusion: in most cases, guidelines do not translate well enough into action (effect on physician behaviour) and are believed to express motivation rather than optimum care. To avoid an academic mirage, recommendations must be disseminated in ways that provide incentives for such action. Those to whom guidelines are directed must be remarkably receptive to, and already prepared to act on the message. There are some indications that the most successful strategy to change the behaviour of clinicians and general practitioners operates at a more local level, and with more careful targeting, than is feasible with a national or regional consensus exercise. In addition, a more forceful action plan and multi-pronged approach (e.g. including continuous medical education) is required.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:10:y:2002:i:04:p:545-553_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Review from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().