Does On-Farm Quality Assurance Pay? A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Grainsafe Program

Umit Karaca, Corinne Alexander and Dirk Maier

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2007, vol. 39, issue 3, 541-556

Abstract: Since the introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops, the commodity grain system has been under pressure to segregate GM and non-GM crops. Starting at the level of the grain handler, members of the grain supply chain have successfully used quality assurance and identity preservation programs to segregate non GM crops. Producers delivering high-value, identity-preserved crops have become interested in implementing these quality management systems at the farm level. We conduct a cost-benefit analysis that shows that quality assurance program may be profitable for producers, depending on their farm size and equipment management strategy.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does On-Farm Quality Assurance Pay? A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Grainsafe Program (2007)
Working Paper: Does On-Farm Quality Assurance Pay? A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Grainsafe Program (2006)
Working Paper: Does On-Farm quality Assurance Pay? A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the GrainSafe Program (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:39:y:2007:i:03:p:541-556_02

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().