WTO dispute settlement: the politics of procedure in Appellate Body rulings

JAMES McCALL Smith

World Trade Review, 2003, vol. 2, issue 1, 65-100

Abstract: This paper investigates how the Appellate Body has coped with its precarious position in the WTO. It must rely on decentralized enforcement of its rulings; interpret new regulatory rules that are complex and contested; hear and resolve all disputes; and deal with governments litigating issues on which they fail to achieve consensus in negotiations. In this setting, the Appellate Body cannot easily promote both its reputation for coherence and its record of compliance – the dual underpinnings of its perceived authority. In response, it has crafted an activist and politically sophisticated approach to several procedural issues. Despite underlying disagreements among member states, the Appellate Body has seized chances to enact procedural reforms that encourage consensus rulings, improve its access to information, and expand its judicial discretion. While no guarantee of success, these procedures should enhance the Appellate Body's ability to reduce the intrinsic political risks of WTO adjudication.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:2:y:2003:i:01:p:65-100_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in World Trade Review from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().