TAX SOVEREIGNTY, STATE BUDGET, FISCAL DISCIPLINE (from an expert and cultural studies viewpoint)

Velcho Stoyanov

Economic Archive, 2013, issue 1, 4

Abstract: The three concepts in the title of this article are fundamental to finance in general and to public finances in particular. Throughout their three-century history they have undergone an evolution that can also be assessed as negative. The purpose of this article is three-fold: first, to present the classical definition of these three concepts, second, to reveal the negative deviations from their classical definition, role, and importance and third, to justify the necessity and the expediency to revive their classical dimensions. As public finances in general, and their three categories, subject to examination and comment in this article have not only purely fiscal, but also political and socio-cultural dimensions, we pay the due attention to them, too. As far as all three studied and discussed financial categories are legally regulated, we wish to emphasize the recommendation of Aristotle about persistence of the law because "the easy alteration of existing laws in favor of new and different ones weakens the power of law itself”.

Keywords: state budget; tax sovereignty; fiscal discipline (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10610/2799

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dat:earchi:y:2013:i:1:p:4

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Archive is currently edited by Andrey Zahariev

More articles in Economic Archive from D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kostadin Bashev ().