WHY THE SUDDEN CHANGE OF THE POLITICAL REGIME IS DETERMINING RISK IN ECONOMY AND SOCIETY?

Ion Lucian Mehedinti (), Otilia Man () and Monica Gabriela Gherman ()
Additional contact information
Ion Lucian Mehedinti: “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania
Monica Gabriela Gherman: University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Economics, Bucharest, Romania

Risk in Contemporary Economy, 2014, 419-426

Abstract: In this article the authors aim to gather an in-depth understanding of the evolution of manking throughout the history and its political regimes, and in the same time are analizing and determining the components of the social function that exercised a great influence on the stability and dynamics of the production and consumption, pointing out that any social organization that wants to remain rational should have as a primary objective the happiness of the people, that so called,“general happiness”, that could only be achieved through education, culture, raising people's moral and intellectual knowledge. Since any political system does not seek the general good, but the one of some persons or a specific group of people, there is only very little communion between them and the people or is entirely missing and for these reasons their reign won’t be long, because the people are always wanting a political change. This "social problem" occurred because of some significant social movements, socialist doctrines whose effects still persist in present times. The efforts of the profound thinkers and mankind throughout the history, with all the positive developments did not materialize in achieving a society in which wealth is equitably distributed, where the contributions of the people in getting them is equally shared that could satisfy the requirements and the needs of the majority members of the society. In all the transformations and society changes or the political regime of the state, the human being represented the base, with its unlimited evolution and thinking, and all of these were achieved in time and were given by a certain social environment. The human being can not be separated from its social environment. He is born to live in the society, but the freedom can not be unlimited of course. The history has shown that all the hasty attempts suffered the same fate and the only sustainable progress made by the people were those who came out slowly, through long series of small changes.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rce.feaa.ugal.ro/images/stories/RCE2014 ... edintiManGherman.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2014:p:419-426

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk in Contemporary Economy from "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gianina Mihai ().