The spatial diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium over 25 years: Geographic proximity and urban hierarchy

Yoann Doignon, Ester Rizzi and Thierry Eggerickx
Additional contact information
Yoann Doignon: CNRS, IDEES (UMR 6266)
Ester Rizzi: Université catholique de Louvain
Thierry Eggerickx: Université catholique de Louvain

Demographic Research, 2020, vol. 43, issue 48, 1413-1428

Abstract: Background: Previous studies have shown that nonmarital cohabitation is socially diffused. However, to our knowledge, no studies exist on spatial aspects of the diffusion. This article examines the spatial diffusion process of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium. Objective: This study aims to answer the following questions: What is the spatial diffusion pattern of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium? In which areas did nonmarital cohabitation increase first, and which areas are resistant to this demographic change? How has this diffusion taken place geographically? Methods: We use data from the Belgian National Register, which makes it possible to achieve analysis at a detailed geographical level (the municipality) and covering a long period of time (1991–2015). We use diachronic cartography to reveal the spatial patterns of diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium. Results: We observed that spatial diffusion of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium is similar to the spread pattern of fertility decline in the first demographic transition. This observed spatial pattern suggests to some degree that this process may have occurred by geographic proximity and through the urban hierarchy. Contribution: The article highlights the importance of investigating nonmarital cohabitation from a spatial and temporal perspective. It describes the spatial pattern of the spread of nonmarital cohabitation in Belgium. To our knowledge, this has never been done before in the existing literature on nonmarital cohabitation. The results highlight a possible diffusion through the urban hierarchy, even if the influence of contextual conditions on diffusion within municipalities cannot be excluded. Our results, although descriptive, could have important implications for future statistical modelling of the diffusion process.

Keywords: Belgium; spatial demography; spatial diffusion; nonmarital cohabitation; propagation diffusion; hierarchical diffusion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol43/48/43-48.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:43:y:2020:i:48

DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.48

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().