Analyzing the impact of prenatal care on infant health: do we have useful input and output measures?

Sankar Mukhopadhyay, Wei Yang (), Wai Lee () and Jeanne Wendel
Additional contact information
Wei Yang: University of Nevada, Reno
Wai Lee: University of Nevada, Reno

Economics Bulletin, 2008, vol. 9, issue 22, 1-14

Abstract: Recent work raises questions about the input and output measures typically used to estimate the impact of prenatal care on infant health: self-reported prenatal care may generate biased estimates of the impact of prenatal care on infant health, and birthweight may be a narrow measure of infant health that leads to underestimation of the impact of prenatal care on delivery outcomes. We link data from a prenatal care clinic, the associated hospital and the relevant birth certificate records to analyze these measurement issues. We conclude that low birthweight is not meaningful measure of infant health for the purpose of estimating the relation between prenatal care and delivery outcomes. In addition, the discrepancy between provider-reported and self-reported care is substantial, the correlation between these two measures is low, and the estimated relationship between prenatal care and infant health is not robust with respect to reliance on self-reported vs. provider-reported care.

JEL-codes: I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-07-23
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2008/Volume9/EB-08I10005A.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08i10005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().