EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fluke of stochastic volatility versus GARCH inevitability or which model creates better forecasts?

Valeriya Lakshina () and Andrey Silaev ()
Additional contact information
Valeriya Lakshina: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Andrey Silaev: National Research University Higher School of Economics

Economics Bulletin, 2016, vol. 36, issue 4, 2368-2380

Abstract: The paper proposes the thorough investigation of in-sample and out-of-sample performance of five GARCH and two stochastic volatility models, estimated on the Russian financial data. The data includes prices of Aeroflot and Gazprom stocks and Ruble against US dollar exchange rates. In our analysis we use probability integral transform for in-sample comparison and Mincer-Zarnowitz regression along with classical forecast performance measures for out-of-sample comparison. Studying both the explanatory and the forecasting power of the considered models we came to the conclusion that stochastic volatility models perform equally or in some cases better than GARCH models.

Keywords: GARCH; stochastic volatility; markov switching multifractal; forecast performance; Mincer-Zarnowitz regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C5 G1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-12-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2016/Volume36/EB-16-V36-I4-P229.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00637

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00637