Standard of proof and volume of litigation: A comparative perspective

Edwige Fain ()
Additional contact information
Edwige Fain: University of Grenoble Alpes, GAEL, France

Economics Bulletin, 2017, vol. 37, issue 4, 2434-2445

Abstract: This paper explores the effect of the standard of proof on the level of litigation. A comparative perspective is adopted to study the consequences of the high standard applying in the civil law tradition as opposed to the low standard (preponderance of evidence) applicable in the common law tradition. To this end, I build on the canonical asymmetric information model, further assuming that a stronger standard of proof decreases the plaintiff's probability of success at trial. With this interpretation, the suit and the settlement probabilities are shown to decrease as the standard of proof becomes more rigorous, everything else being equal. Thus, the analysis suggests that the standard of proof may be part of the explanation for differences in litigation activity patterns across countries.

Keywords: Litigation; Standard of proof; Asymmetric information; Pretrial-negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-10-26
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2017/Volume37/EB-17-V37-I4-P217.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00296

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().