A PRACTICAL GUIDANCE TO THE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF COURTS. CASE OF DANILEÈš v. ROMANIA (judgement of February 20, 2024, application no. 16915/21)

Alina Gioroceanu
Additional contact information
Alina Gioroceanu: University of Craiova

Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 2024, vol. 11, issue 1, 371-382

Abstract: This article uses the case of DanileÈ› v. Romania to explore the pragmatic parameters of communication in court settings and their impact on legal decisions. It analyzes the use of humor and irony by magistrates, examining various interpretations of the case's outcome. The study delves into the multiple layers of meaning in courtroom discourse, considering contextual factors and the role of language in shaping judicial authority.

Keywords: Pragmatics; linguistics; law; ECHR; Article 10; humor; irony; courtroom discourse; judicial communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/sserr-11-1-371-382.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:371-382

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15258215

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences and Education Research Review is currently edited by Stefan Vladutescu

More articles in Social Sciences and Education Research Review from Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan Valeriu Voinea ().