EMOTIONS, THOUGHTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH METHODS AND PUBLICATION ETHICS COURSE

Fusun Gulderen Alacapinar
Additional contact information
Fusun Gulderen Alacapinar: Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education, Konya, Turkey

Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 2021, vol. 8, issue 2, 42-53

Abstract: What are the reasons for participating in the joint Scientific Research Methods and Publication Ethics course of the students enrolled in the Graduate School of Educational Sciences, the benefits it provides, the quality of the education provided and the views on the additional course? In this study, the phenomenological method of qualitative research was used. Since the research is qualitative, no universe and sample determination were made. The appropriate working group was used. Students claimed that they attended this program because of 'academic career, specialization and self-development'. It can be said that, the criticism and suggestions of the students toward the course are collected in the dimension of 'system, course, lecturer, suggestions and affective'. It can be argued that their views on the additional course are in the categories of 'productive, unproductive and I could not participate'. Students want to consider student requests and conditions, reduce the number of students, use the system effectively with the least number of error, extend the course duration, and give feedback and corrections to each student while doing distance education.

Keywords: Scientific Research; University; Student; Emotion; Thought; Suggestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/sserr-8-2-42-53.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:8:y:2021:i:2:p:42-53

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5784726

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences and Education Research Review is currently edited by Stefan Vladutescu

More articles in Social Sciences and Education Research Review from Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan Valeriu Voinea ().