Combined assessment of material and energy supply risks in the energy transition: A multi-objective energy system optimization approach

Gianvito Colucci, Jonas Finke, Valentin Bertsch, Valeria Di Cosmo and Laura Savoldi

Applied Energy, 2025, vol. 388, issue C, No S0306261925003770

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel framework to study the trade-off between different energy transition supply risks through multi-objective energy system optimization. While the increasing use of clean energy technologies reduces reliance on fossil fuels imports and hence energy supply risks, these technologies depend heavily on critical raw materials, the supply chains of which present high geographical concentration and political instability. Current energy system planning lacks endogenous evaluations (e.g., minimization) of such supply risks. To address this gap, two consistent supply risk functions are derived considering concentration, import reliance, and political stability of supply chains of critical raw materials on the one hand and energy commodities on the other hand. We enhance the open-source energy system modeling framework TEMOA by multi-objective optimization using the AUGMECON method to consider these functions endogenously as objectives and demonstrate the capabilities of this new approach for the Italian power sector decarbonization by 2050. First, total system cost and CO2 emissions are minimized to establish a baseline. Then, four multi-objective optimizations between material and energy supply risks are conducted, each allowing for increasing total system cost. This approach allows the underlying energy system to adapt to minimize supply risks. Results highlight a significant trade-off between the two risks. Minimizing the material supply risk increases energy supply risk by reducing investments in wind turbines and batteries. These technologies are replaced by solar PV and natural gas plants with CCS, which raises gas imports and energy supply risk. Higher costs lead to wind energy disappearance, replaced mainly by natural gas plants, increasing reliance on CCS and imports. These findings emphasize the importance of balancing material and energy supply risks in energy system planning.

Keywords: Material supply risk; Energy supply risk; Critical raw materials; Energy transition; Energy system models; Multi-objective optimization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925003770
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:388:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925003770

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125647

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().