 Affirmative action, college access and major choice: Redistribution with strategic behaviorEconomics of Education Review, 2025, vol. 105, issue C Abstract: I estimate the redistributive and behavioral effects of a race-neutral affirmative action policy targeting low-income applicants at a flagship university in Brazil. I find that the policy redistributed college seats toward applicants from low socioeconomic backgrounds and underrepresented racial groups, increasing their representation in selective majors. This diversity gain came with an expected decrease in the average achievement of the incoming cohort but retained admissions for candidates in the upper half of the statewide achievement distribution. Applicants also responded strategically to the policy by adjusting their application choices, resulting in a reduction of the socioeconomic gap in applications to selective majors by 21 percent of the unconditional gap and 36 percent when comparing applicants with similar academic backgrounds and demographic characteristics. However, while some applicants successfully updated their choices, others aimed too high and missed their chance of admission—an especially costly outcome for the targeted group. Keywords: Affirmative action; Higher education; Redistribution; Major-choice (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:105:y:2025:i:c:s0272775725000020 DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102622 Access Statistics for this article Economics of Education Review is currently edited by E. Cohn More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.