Gender Bias in Evaluation Processes

Eva Arceo-Gomez and Raymundo M. Campos-Vazquez

Economics of Education Review, 2022, vol. 89, issue C

Abstract: Women's representation at the top is still an issue on the agenda for equality. In this paper, we contribute to the literature on the effect of female application reviewers on the performance of women in selection processes. We define gender bias as any differential treatment of female and male applicants. We are particularly interested in whether the gender of the evaluator plays a role in this bias. Using a unique dataset from Mexico, we exploit the fact that applicants cannot select their evaluators and vice versa, that the gender composition of the reviewers chosen is unknown to individual evaluators, and that information is available on the scoring of different aspects of the application. Even though the pairing of applicants to evaluators is not entirely random, we show that the results are robust to specifications and sample restrictions where random assignment is much more likely. The key results are as follows. First, female evaluators assign male applicants a score close to 0.10 standard deviations higher than male evaluators. Second, male reviewers score male and female applicants similarly. Third, female reviewers grade female applicants more harshly than male applicants (by 0.04-0.05 standard deviations), although the estimate is imprecise. We explore three possible mechanisms behind these results and find evidence consistent with gender stereotyping.

Keywords: Gender; Biases; Stereotypes; Gender representation gaps; Science; Mexico (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C90 C91 J16 O54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775722000486
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:89:y:2022:i:c:s0272775722000486

DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102272

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Education Review is currently edited by E. Cohn

More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().