Power analysis as a tool to analyse trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest management: A case study from nine European countries

Nataly Juerges, Bas Arts, Mauro Masiero, Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein, José G. Borges, Yvonne Brodrechtova, Vilis Brukas, Maria João Canadas, Pedro Ochôa Carvalho, Giulia Corradini, Edwin Corrigan, Adam Felton, Uzay Karahalil, Uğur Karakoc, Max Krott, Jim van Laar, Isak Lodin, Anders Lundholm, Ekaterina Makrickienė, Marlene Marques, Américo Mendes, Gintautas Mozgeris, Ana Novais, Davide Pettenella, Nerijus Pivoriūnas and Burak Sarı

Ecosystem Services, 2021, vol. 49, issue C

Abstract: Forests are of major importance to people, providing fundamental ecosystem services (ESs). Increasing the supply of an ES might negatively affect the supply of another ES. For example, increasing game densities might reduce timber production. Such trade-offs among ESs may lead to conflicts between actors interested in prioritizing different ESs. This study describes which actors dominated conflicts about ES trade-offs, and which power strategies they used to do so. Forest management practices and resulting trade-offs between ESs differ widely among the studied countries: Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Turkey. We triangulated 220 qualitative interviews, literature review, document analysis, and participatory observations. We mapped the interests of actors in ESs and identified conflicts between interests. We tested three hypotheses about which actors were more or less powerful, enabling them to be winners and losers in ES conflicts. Cultural and regulating and maintenance ESs played an important role in conflicts about forest ES trade-offs. We identified the power relations of actors with different interests in ES. Local interests often dominated national interests. Actors interested in provisioning ESs had strong power resources but because of specific bio-geophysical, political or economic conditions, actors with interest in regulating and maintenance ES or cultural ESs can have equal or stronger power resources. The study highlights the relevance of including power analysis in ES research.

Keywords: Conflict; Ecosystem service; Europe; Forest management; Policy analysis; Power; Trade-off (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041621000486
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:49:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000486

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101290

Access Statistics for this article

Ecosystem Services is currently edited by Leon C Braat

More articles in Ecosystem Services from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().