De-risking green hydrogen? Insights from Chile and South Africa

Sören Scholvin, Anthony Black and Glen Robbins

Energy Policy, 2025, vol. 198, issue C

Abstract: Proponents of green hydrogen projects argue that investment in this new industry has to be ‘de-risked’ to overcome industry-specific uncertainties and other challenges typical to developing countries. However, some scholars have warned against de-risking strategies because of the financial burden as well as broader economic and political dependencies they may induce. This policy perspective discusses de-risking with regard to financial drawbacks. It focusses on Chile and South Africa, two countries that are likely to play a major role in emerging green hydrogen global value chains. The authors contend that facilitative value-chain oriented policies are the preferable option for de-risking, whereas recently introduced credit schemes could, indeed, lead to a debt trap. They suggest that partners from the Global North assume a higher share of the risk involved with financing green hydrogen projects. Even in that case, de-risking does not guarantee late-comer development, and potential economic and political dependencies ought to be assessed.

Keywords: Chile; Derisking; Energy transition; Global value chain; Hydrogen; South Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005056
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524005056

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114485

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Policy is currently edited by N. France

More articles in Energy Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().