Assessing the environmental impacts and water consumption of pretreatment and conditioning processes of corn stover hydrolysate liquor in biorefineries
Shu-Yuan Pan,
Yupo J. Lin,
Seth W. Snyder,
Hwong-Wen Ma and
Pen-Chi Chiang
Energy, 2016, vol. 116, issue P1, 436-444
Abstract:
In biorefinery procedures, pretreatment and conditioning of lignocellulose substrates are considered critical to enhance yields and rates of transformation. These processes use large volumes of water and chemicals, impacting the sustainability and economics of the biorefinery industry. In this study, we evaluate four pretreatment and conditioning process scenarios for removing acidic impurities from corn stover hydrolysate liquor, i.e., overliming, ammonia addition, two-stage treatment and membrane separations. The environmental impacts of these processes were determined using a life cycle assessment (LCA). Moreover, both the water and carbon footprints were estimated by considering energy and materials consumption. The results indicate that ammonia addition, two-stage treatment and membrane separations reduce environmental impacts in comparison to overliming. Integrated membrane separations exhibited the lowest water consumption (i.e., 2.5 L/kg-biomass) and carbon footprint (i.e., 6.2 g CO2/kg-biomass). In membrane separations, acidic impurities can be selectively recovered by electrodeionization as value-added products or reuse as process chemicals. Based on the LCA results, an integrated solution for hydrolysate pretreatment and conditioning is proposed as a cleaner and more sustainable process for the biorefinery industry.
Keywords: Lignocellulose; Life cycle assessment; Water footprint; Carbon footprint; Umberto; Integrated membrane process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216313810
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:116:y:2016:i:p1:p:436-444
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.109
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().