2.3 The hybrid approach to demand modeling

David B. Reister

Energy, 1990, vol. 15, issue 3, 249-260

Abstract: This paper presents an engineering-economic approach for developing energy demand models. The approach combines the economic theory of production with engineering process data. We review the economic theory of production, the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) function, and the Logit function. Using the Oak Ridge Industrial Model (ORIM) as a case study, we show how the Logit function can be used to specify a fuel share model and how the CES function can be used to specify an energy conservation model. Shephard's lemma is a key result of the economic theory of production. The lemma can be used to derive input-output coefficients from a cost function. We use CES cost functions because they have good global properties. To obtain more flexibility, we use nested CES cost functions. To identify the parameters in a nested CES structure, we assume that the multilevel cost function corresponds to a multistage production process. When input-output coefficients are derived from a cost function, the tradeoffs between the factors satisfy the law of diminishing returns. Energy conservation occurs when capital, labor, or materials are substituted for energy service. In most cases, the substitution obeys the law of diminishing returns. Thus, a CES cost function can be used to specify an energy conservation model. Normally, perfect substitutes do not obey the law of diminishing returns. Since we include all of the costs for each option (the options use fuel and provide energy service) in ORIM, the options are perfect substitutes and do not satisfy the law of diminishing returns. Since the options are perfect substitutes, we use the Logit function to specify the ORIM fuel share model.

Date: 1990
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036054429090087I
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:15:y:1990:i:3:p:249-260

DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(90)90087-I

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().