CO2 capture cost saving through waste heat recovery using transport membrane condenser in different solvent-based carbon capture processes

Qiufang Cui, Te Tu, Long Ji and Shuiping Yan

Energy, 2021, vol. 216, issue C

Abstract: In this study, the waste heat from the hot stripping gas was recovered by adopting the transport membrane condenser (TMC) in the monoethanolamine (MEA)-, diethanolamine (DEA)-, piperazine (PZ)- and potassium glycinate (PG)-based rich-split modified carbon capture processes. A 220-h test showed that TMC can exhibit a good stability on the waste heat recovery performance. The PZ-based TMC-modified rich-split process (i.e., PZ-case) achieved a highest waste heat recovery performance, followed by the PG-case, MEA-case and DEA-case. A strong linear relationship between the heat and water fluxes was observed during the waste heat recovery. Three scenarios were considered for comparing the CO2 capture cost savings of 4 cases. When the TMC area was fixed meaning the same additional investment of rich-split modification, PZ-case gained the highest CO2 capture cost saving ($6.40/t-CO2), followed by PG-, MEA- and DEA-case. When a fixed waste heat recovery performance of 600 kJ/kg-CO2 was required for obtaining the same revenue after rich-split modification, PZ- and PG-case obtained the same CO2 capture cost saving of $4.22/t-CO2. Moreover, when the reboiler duty reduction potential was aimed at 15%, PG-case achieved the maximum CO2 capture cost saving ($4.56/t-CO2).

Keywords: CO2 desorption; Regeneration; Reboiler duty; Energy saving; CO2 capture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422032332X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s036054422032332x

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119225

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().