 On the Second-Law inconsistency of Emergy AnalysisEnrico Sciubba Energy, 2010, vol. 35, issue 9, 3696-3706 Abstract: The paper argues against the claim made by Emergy Analysts that emergy is an exergy-based procedure. Both Emergy- and Exergy Analysis employ space- and time integrated energy input/output models to quantitatively assess the resource consumption of physical systems: the issue at stake is whether Emergy is embodied energy or embodied exergy. Although the compatibility of Exergy- and Emergy accounting procedures, the significance of the peculiar Emergy Algebra, and some cost-allocation issues have been studied in detail, a final agreement could not be reached, so that some doubt exists about the degree of compatibility of the two methods. The present paper shows that the definitions and the procedures employed in Emergy Analysis are in fact First Law-based, and that they neglect or misrepresent Second Law issues. This conclusion is reached by carefully reviewing and critically analyzing a series of general and specific procedures contained in the original Odum books and in some of the most representative publications by Emergy analysts. Keywords: Emergy; Exergy; Systems analysis; Second Law Environmental Indicators (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:9:p:3696-3706 DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.015 Access Statistics for this article Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser More articles in Energy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.