Conditions shaping policy enactment: Insights from evaluators at the bottom of the implementation staircase

Krista Brower

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2025, vol. 111, issue C

Abstract: The current study advances understanding of policy enactment by conceptualizing the conditions influencing policy implementation in healthcare. A qualitative interview study examines how micro-level evaluators experience enacting macro-level policy, leveraging the implementation staircase model (Reynolds & Saunders, 1987). Three key themes emerged: alignment divide, value and impact, and policy leadership, summarizing nine conditions for policy enactment. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews (n = 8), document reviews (n = 6), and researcher reflections. Findings suggest that the evaluators' position at the lower levels of the implementation staircase amplifies the gap between policy and practice. Results highlight the crucial role of relationships between top and bottom layers of the staircase in influencing policy enactment.

Keywords: Policy enactment; Evaluation policy; Implementation staircase; Healthcare policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000680
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000680

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102601

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().