Perceptions of evaluator professional autonomy in North American evaluation practice

Sandra Ayoo

Evaluation and Program Planning, 2023, vol. 98, issue C

Abstract: Scholarship from the sociology of professions has illustrated the important role that autonomy must play in professional relationships, especially in technically-specific and relationally-strong fields of practice like program evaluation. Theoretically, autonomy is important because the evaluation professional ought to be free to make recommendations in several key areas: framing the evaluation questions, including questions of unintended consequences; developing evaluation plans; choosing methods; analyzing data; making conclusions, including negative findings in reports; and, increasingly, ensuring that historically underrepresented stakeholders without voice are represented and involved in the evaluation process. This study found that evaluators in Canada and the USA reportedly did not perceive autonomy as related to the larger role of the field of evaluation, but rather as a contextual personal concern, that is, related to matters of personal circumstance, such as their workplace, years of experience, financial security, and the backing or lack thereof from professional associations. The article concludes with implications for practice and future research.

Keywords: Professionalization; Professional autonomy; Professionalism; Self-assessment; Program evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923000460
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:98:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000460

DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102269

Access Statistics for this article

Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell

More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().