Using Scopus’s CiteScore for assessing the quality of computer science conferences

Lokman I. Meho

Journal of Informetrics, 2019, vol. 13, issue 1, 419-433

Abstract: Publication, hiring, promotion, tenure, and funding decisions in computer science often depend on an accurate assessment of the quality of conferences. This study reviews relevant literature and tests Scopus’s CiteScore database and method for evaluating the quality of 395 conferences in the field.

Keywords: Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; CiteScore; Conference publications; Conference ratings; Conference rankings; Google Scholar Metrics; Impact factor; Microsoft Academic; Publishing; Research assessment; Research evaluation; Scopus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157718304176
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:infome:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:419-433

DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.006

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Informetrics is currently edited by Leo Egghe

More articles in Journal of Informetrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().