Manufacturing an illusory consensus? A bibliometric analysis of the international debate on education privatisation

Antoni Verger, Clara Fontdevila, Ruarri Rogan and Thomas Gurney

International Journal of Educational Development, 2019, vol. 64, issue C, 81-95

Abstract: As one of the most polarised areas in education research, the education privatisation debate generates opportunities for knowledge-brokers to promote their preferred policy alternatives. Based on bibliometric analysis techniques, this paper maps the configuration of the academic debate on privatisation, and explores how it is connected with the references mobilized by a group of international agencies located at the interstices of the research and policy fields. Our findings suggest that, when confronted with certain incentives, some international agencies use evidence in a selective and tactical way as a means to support their pre-established policy pReferences.

Keywords: Privatisation; International organisations; Bibliometrics; Network analysis; Knowledge brokers [free descriptor]; Evidence-based policy [free descriptor] (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059317302079
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:injoed:v:64:y:2019:i:c:p:81-95

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.011

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Educational Development is currently edited by Stephen P Heyneman

More articles in International Journal of Educational Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().