 Is rehabilitative approach to criminal justice better for young adults? Evidence from Santa Clara County, CAEduardo Aceves, Saroj Dhital and Kimberly D'zatko Journal of Criminal Justice, 2025, vol. 99, issue C Abstract: Behavioral and psychoneurological research indicates that young adults 18 to 24 years old are likely to benefit more from rehabilitative over punitive criminal justice approaches. To test the hypothesis empirically, the paper studies the impact of a rehabilitative Young Adult Deferred Entry of Judgement (YADEJ) program in Santa Clara County, CA. By focusing on education, employment, housing, and life skills, YADEJ aims to reduce reoffending rates among young adults in Santa Clara County. The paper uses matching models as the baseline methodologies. The paper employed Difference-in-Differences and Regression Discontinuity Design to test the robustness of the baseline findings. The paper provides evidence of lower recidivism rates, in the magnitude of about 20 percentage points, among young adults who participated in the YADEJ program relative to those subject to the adult correction approach in Santa Clara County, CA. The finding is statistically significant, robust, and quantitatively meaningful. Keywords: Transitional age youth; Young adults; Rehabilitative; Recidivism (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500090x DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102441 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Criminal Justice is currently edited by Matthew DeLisi More articles in Journal of Criminal Justice from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.