Never say never: Optimal exclusion and reserve prices with expectations-based loss-averse buyers
Benjamin Balzer and
Antonio Rosato
Journal of Economic Theory, 2025, vol. 228, issue C
Abstract:
We analyze reserve prices in auctions with independent private values when bidders are expectations-based loss averse. We find that the optimal public reserve price excludes fewer bidder types than under risk neutrality. Moreover, we show that public reserve prices are not optimal as the seller can earn a higher revenue with mechanisms that better leverage the “attachment effect”. We discuss two such mechanisms: i) an auction with a secret and random reserve price, and ii) a mechanism where an auction with a public reserve price is followed by a negotiation if the reserve price is not met. Both of these mechanisms expose more bidder types to the attachment effect, thereby increasing bids and ultimately revenue.
Keywords: Reference-dependent preferences; Loss aversion; Reserve price; First-price auction; Second-price auction; Personal equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D44 D81 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053125000912
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Never Say Never: Optimal Exclusion and Reserve Prices with Expectations-Based Loss-Averse Buyers (2023) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:228:y:2025:i:c:s0022053125000912
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2025.106045
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell
More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().