The effect of underreporting on LIBOR rates

Andrea Monticini and Daniel Thornton

Journal of Macroeconomics, 2013, vol. 37, issue C, 345-348

Abstract: On May 29, 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported that several large international banks were reporting unjustifiably low LIBOR rates. Since then two large banks, Barclays and UBS, have paid significant fines for manipulating their LIBOR rates, and additional banks are expected to be fined. This paper investigates whether the underreporting of LIBOR rates by some banks significantly affected the reported LIBOR rate by testing whether there was a significant change in the relationship between the LIBOR rate and another rate that reflects the default risk of banks.

Keywords: LIBOR rate; Default risk; Structural breaks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E43 E44 G10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070413000529
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The effect of underreporting on LIBOR rates (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:37:y:2013:i:c:p:345-348

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.02.002

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Macroeconomics is currently edited by Douglas McMillin and Theodore Palivos

More articles in Journal of Macroeconomics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().