Do perceptions of the utility of ethics affect academic cheating?

Brian Winrow

Journal of Accounting Education, 2016, vol. 37, issue C, 1-12

Abstract: Academic cheating is an epidemic that higher educational institutions have struggled to contain. The pervasiveness of cheating among business majors is alarming as students who cheat in the academic setting are more likely to engage in unethical behavior while in the workplace (Carpenter et al., 2004; McCabe et al., 1996; Nonis & Swift, 2001). While the business and accounting literature has previously explored academic and demographic characteristics associated with cheating, the extant research has not explored whether there is a relationship between students' perceptions as to the utility of ethics in the workplace (defined as the importance employers place on ethics when hiring applicants for entry-level positions) and the prevalence of academic cheating. Thus, the purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between undergraduate business and accounting students' perceptions of the utility of ethical behavior in the workplace and their likelihood to cheat in school. Using PLS-SEM, this study concludes that the frequency of cheating in each of the four categories examined (planned cheating, spontaneous cheating, plagiarism, and improper use of resources) was predicted to increase for every standardized increase in rank of ethics toward less important. The relationship existed even when testing for social desirability bias.

Keywords: Academic cheating; Academic misconduct; Business ethics; Cheating; Plagiarism; Social desirability bias; PLS-SEM; Workplace misconduct (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575116300495
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joaced:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:1-12

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.07.001

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Education is currently edited by Natalie Tatiana Churyk

More articles in Journal of Accounting Education from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().