Mind your own break! The interactive effect of workday respite activities and mindfulness on employee outcomes via affective linkages

SinHui Chong, You Jin Kim, Hun Whee Lee, Russell E. Johnson and Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2020, vol. 159, issue C, 64-77

Abstract: Workday respite activities are supposed to be beneficial for employees due to their intended relaxing and enjoyable nature, but employees may find it difficult to agilely switch their awareness and attention between work tasks and respite activities during work hours. Based on affective events and mindfulness-to-meaning theories, we propose workday respite activities as affective events and identify mindfulness—the exercise of non-judgmental awareness and attention to the present moment—as a moderator that facilitates psychological detachment from work during workday respite activities, which in turn enhances employee outcomes later in the day via affective states. Our results from three experience-sampling studies with full-time employees indicate that engaging in workday respite activities is indirectly and positively related with intrinsic motivation and work engagement via psychological detachment and positive affective state, while negatively related with work stress and emotional exhaustion via psychological detachment and negative affective state, especially when mindfulness is higher.

Keywords: Mindfulness; Workday respite activities; Psychological detachment; Affective states, intrinsic motivation; Work engagement; Work stress; Emotional exhaustion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597817308907
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:159:y:2020:i:c:p:64-77

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.001

Access Statistics for this article

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes is currently edited by John M. Schaubroeck

More articles in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().