U.S. tax policy and health insurance demand: Can a regressive policy improve welfare?

Karsten Jeske and Sagiri Kitao

Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, vol. 56, issue 2, 210-221

Abstract: The U.S. tax policy on health insurance is regressive because it subsidizes only those offered group insurance through their employers, who also tend to have a relatively high income. Moreover, the subsidy takes the form of deductions from the progressive income tax system giving high income earners a larger subsidy. To understand the effect of the policy, we construct a dynamic general equilibrium model with heterogenous agents and an endogenous demand for health insurance. A complete removal of the subsidy may lead to a partial collapse of the group insurance market, reduce the insurance coverage and deteriorate welfare. There is, however, room for improving the coverage and welfare by extending a refundable credit to the individual insurance market.

Keywords: Health; insurance; Risk-sharing; Tax; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (112)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-3932(08)00181-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: U.S. tax policy and health insurance demand: can a regressive policy improve welfare? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:moneco:v:56:y:2009:i:2:p:210-221

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Monetary Economics is currently edited by R. G. King and C. I. Plosser

More articles in Journal of Monetary Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().