EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reprint of “Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling”

Daria Battini, Christoph H. Glock, Eric H. Grosse, Alessandro Persona and Fabio Sgarbossa

International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, vol. 194, issue C, 32-42

Abstract: Over the last decades, academics and practitioners have paid much attention to lot-sizing, which determines economic order and production quantities by balancing inventory holding and setup cost. Recently, researchers have started to integrate sustainability issues into lot-sizing models. The focus of these works has been on environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability, however, while only few contributions studied the social aspect of this problem. Especially in in-house logistics, where a high amount of manual material handling is performed, lot-sizing decisions can have a significant impact on workload and human performance, which can have a strong influence on ergonomic parameters and thus worker welfare.

Keywords: Lot-sizing; Ergonomics; Rest allowance; In-house logistics; Manual material handling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527317303493
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:proeco:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:32-42

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.003

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Production Economics is currently edited by Stefan Minner

More articles in International Journal of Production Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:32-42