Numerical study on the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties of compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in aquifers

Yi Li, Hao Yu, Yi Li, Yaning Liu, Guijin Zhang, Dong Tang and Zhongming Jiang

Renewable Energy, 2020, vol. 151, issue C, 1318-1338

Abstract: Solving the undesirable intermittence and fluctuation problems of renewable energy production needs complementary energy storage on a large scale. Compressed air energy storage in caverns (CAES-C) has been verified as an effective technique. To further improve the energy storage efficiency and save costs, compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAES-A) and compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in aquifers (CCES-A) were proposed successively. However, the operation performances of CCES-A, especially the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties of its underground components (the wellbore-reservoir system), are not clear. Here we introduce a coupled wellbore and reservoir model, T2WELL-ECO2N, initially used for geologic carbon sequestration simulation, for simulating the dynamics of CO2 injection and production through wellbore in both the construction and operation stages of CCES-A. The temperature, pressure, CO2 saturation and transfer, energy efficiency, maximum system cycle times, total stress change induced by CO2 injection in aquifer, and sensitivity analysis of permeability in the wellbore-reservoir system of the designed CCES-A are comprehensively studied. The simulation results show that during the operation stage the CO2 is supercritical and fluctuates in both wellbore and aquifer where the CO2 saturation decreases and CO2 bubble generally moves to the central and lower parts of the target aquifer rather than the outside direction. The system itself effectively alleviates the loss of CO2 mass from the side walls of the aquifer. The fact that the cold CO2 zone in the aquifer can continuously receive energy by heat transfer from the surroundings helps the energy efficiency of the CCES-A system gradually increase, and even reach 1.1. The system cycle times exceed 1000 days when the aquifer permeability is larger than 5.0 × 10−13 m2, indicating that CCES-A needs less time to reconstruct the cushion gas compared with CAES-A and can lower the operating cost accordingly.

Keywords: Compressed CO2 energy storage; Aquifer; Energy efficiency; Thermodynamic process; Numerical study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119318294
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:151:y:2020:i:c:p:1318-1338

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.135

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides

More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().