Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process models for discrete choice: Mode choice in New York City

Daniel F. Villarraga and Ricardo A. Daziano

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2025, vol. 191, issue C

Abstract: Standard Discrete Choice Models (DCMs) assume that unobserved effects that influence decision-making are independently and identically distributed among individuals. When unobserved effects are spatially correlated, the independence assumption does not hold, leading to biased standard errors and potentially biased parameter estimates. This paper proposes an interpretable Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process (HNNGP) model to account for spatially correlated unobservables in discrete choice analysis. Gaussian Processes (GPs) are often regarded as lacking interpretability due to their non-parametric nature. However, we demonstrate how to incorporate GPs directly into the latent utility specification to flexibly model spatially correlated unobserved effects without sacrificing structural economic interpretation. To empirically test our proposed HNNGP models, we analyze binary and multinomial mode choices for commuting to work in New York City. For the multinomial case, we formulate and estimate HNNGPs with and without independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA). Building on the interpretability of our modeling strategy, we provide both point estimates and credible intervals for the value of travel time savings in NYC. Finally, we compare the results from all proposed specifications with those derived from a standard logit model and a probit model with spatially autocorrelated errors (SAE) to showcase how accounting for different sources of spatial correlation in discrete choice can significantly impact inference. We also show that the HNNGP models attain better out-of-sample prediction performance when compared to the logit and probit SAE models, especially in the multinomial case.

Keywords: Hierarchical Gaussian process; Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process (NNGP); Spatially autoregressive models; Interpretable machine learning; Discrete choice; Travel mode choice; Value of Travel Time (VOTT) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126152400256X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transb:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s019126152400256x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.103132

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological is currently edited by Fred Mannering

More articles in Transportation Research Part B: Methodological from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().