EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An analytical method for aircraft collision risk estimation

Stephen L. M. Hockaday and Alypios Chatziioanou

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1986, vol. 20, issue 5, 415-428

Abstract: Transportation system safety is difficult to assess, particularly when examining future systems that are unlike existing systems. The absence of consensus concerning safety metrics and associated mathematical techniques inhibits implementation of improvements. One method for assessing safety was recently applied to assess new air traffic control procedures. The method contains several steps, including use of a collision risk model. The model uses probability theory to assess collision risk between aircraft due to random deviations from course. Techniques that recognize human monitoring and intervention to avoid collisions must be combined with the model to obtain absolute values of risk. Examples of model application are presented, together with a discussion of model limitations and use.

Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(86)90013-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transb:v:20:y:1986:i:5:p:415-428

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological is currently edited by Fred Mannering

More articles in Transportation Research Part B: Methodological from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:20:y:1986:i:5:p:415-428