EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Structural change in Mexicos employment and the impact of Nafta

Enrique Dussel Peters ()

Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 1996, vol. 16, issue 4, 590-619

Abstract: Mexican society and economy are at an extremely complex historical crossroads.The Mexican liberalization strategy, as in many other Latin American countries, hasprivileged macroeconomic aspects, ignoring crucial issues such as savings and domesticinvestment, growth and employment, among others. The results of this strategy areunsustainable and present several weaknesses, as was evident in the crisis of December 1994.An important aspect of this situation is that the private sector is at the center of the crisis.Only a few economic activities have been able to generate employment opportunities abovethe minimum necessary for Mexican society. Several time series models demonstrate thatGDP growth is fundamental for job creation; however, it is difficult to imagine that it ispossible to achieve an annual GDP growth greater than 10%, the level necessary to absorbthe growth of the economically active population. To mitigate this situation, a profoundreformulation of the liberalization strategy and an explicit job creation policy are suggested. JEL Classification: F62; F43; F36.

Keywords: Stabilization; globalization; financial crisis; unemployment; NAFTA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/ind ... ticle/view/1220/1205 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:16:y:1996:i:4:p:590-619:id:1220

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy from Center of Political Economy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:16:y:1996:i:4:p:590-619:id:1220