 Banks are different: why bank-based versus market-based lending is a false dichotomyCarolyn Sissoko
European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 2025, vol. 22, issue 1, 32-53 Abstract: This paper introduces modern readers to ‘banking theory’, that is, to the understanding of the banking system that was held by academics and practitioners in the early years of the twentieth century. This theory contrasts with the theoretic framework that views banks as intermediaries that receive deposits and invest deposits in assets. The basic elements of banking theory are related to the modern network effects literature, and a bank-centered view of the financial system is derived: all demand and short-term bank liabilities, including contingent liabilities, are potential money and near-money assets; and any non-bank liabilities that have monetary properties derive them from the banking system. This framework is then used to evaluate modern money markets, and the paper proposes that bank-liability–based measures of the money supply be developed, and that regulators recognize that contingent bank liabilities often function as a substitute for deposits and should be regulated similarly. Keywords: banking theory; circuit theory; contingent liabilities; money market; network effects (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p32-53 Access Statistics for this article European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention is currently edited by Torsten Niechoj More articles in European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention from Edward Elgar Publishing |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.