Organization and Management Theory in the Aspect of Signs and Symbols of Modern Humanities

Wiktor Kolwzan, Leszek Zelek, Agnieszka Skowronek-Gradziel, Joanna Kalisz and Sofia Palvinskaia

European Research Studies Journal, 2025, vol. XXVIII, issue 1, 761-781

Abstract: Purpose: The text concerns the foundations of the methodology of science (primarily in its pragmatic application to organization and management theory) with reference to the two fundamental dimensions (approaches) through which processes and objects are analysed in science—form and contents. Why are only these two dimensions considered in our analysis? On the one hand, it is the legacy of Plato, and above all, of Aristotle, who conducted this discourse in great detail. This approach and perception of form and contents are embedded in the dilemmas of contemporary management. However, our approach to this issue is expressed through the structures of the humanities—soft structures. Design/Methodology/Approach: The two approaches to understanding matter influence how objects are examined and studied using the resulting methodologies. One category of methodology includes formal models and methods, while the other involves content-based approaches. This article discusses the application of these methodologies to the study of real and mental processes from a humanities perspective. Here, the focus is on perceiving the form and contents of processes for management practice, rather than viewing them solely through the lens of formal theories. Findings: The analysis of the relationships occurring in the sciences that form the foundation of science (through the classification of signs, forms, and contents of the humanities) demonstrates the vast potential of science to create its language for practical purposes, including broadly understood management, applicable in every area of human activity. Practical Implications: The theory of form and contents offers invaluable practical benefits for management practice and organization theory. They facilitate the interpretation of research results obtained through formal management methods. For management purposes, it is practically obligatory to interpret the contents of results provided by formal sciences in a rational way (transforming quantity into words). Originality/Value: The authors' originality lies in emphasising the integration of three humanities disciplines in the analysis of content related to management, among other things, and the methods of the formal sciences. The authors have added biology and psychology to the fields of mathematics and physics. These disciplines collectively comprise three areas: the physical, the biological and the semantic (mental, content-related, psychological and abstractly mathematical).

Keywords: Cognitive structures; category of signs and symbols; epistemology of science; contents; scientific language; language of ontology; language of science and its unity. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B40 D83 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ersj.eu/journal/3983/download (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:761-781

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Research Studies Journal from European Research Studies Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marios Agiomavritis ().