Competing Demands: A Critical Review of Stakeholder Accountability Models in Global Higher Education

Atul Kumar, Rijwan Shaikh, Manesh Palav, Rahul Dhaigude, Srinivasa Rao Kasisomayajula and Shirish Raibagkar
Additional contact information
Atul Kumar: Vikrant University, Gwalior, India
Rijwan Shaikh: Sinhgad Institute of Management, Vadgaon Br., Pune, India
Manesh Palav: Global Business School and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India
Rahul Dhaigude: Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
Srinivasa Rao Kasisomayajula: Department of Commerce & Business Management (CDOE), Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (K L University), Guntur, India
Shirish Raibagkar: Institute of Cost Accountants of India, Kolkata, India

European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2026, vol. 13, issue 3, 275-293

Abstract: Recent major crises of integrity in India's high-stakes national exams, including leaks of NEET UG papers in 2024 and 2026, have provoked a strong wave of public reaction. There have been student protests and calls for resignation of Government ministers. Also, a party called Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) was formed and is campaigning against systemic irregularities. This focused literature review synthesizes research by 47 authors to delineate a framework of accountability in higher education. The review is organized along five thematic lines: key components of accountability as a governing principle; distribution of accountability within the ecosystem of higher education; integrity of exams and their effect on public trust; assurance of quality and accreditation as accountability mechanisms; and the intersection of accountability with employability relevance and institutional governance. Drawing on scholarly work from India, South Asia, Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia, this review shows that accountability goes beyond security measures and punitive actions. Accountability is a complex framework that includes financial transparency, ethical governance, freedom for scholars, stakeholder engagement, and evidence-based governance. The review provides a comprehensive framework for accountability in higher education organized around a conceptual table that identifies various dimensions of accountability, actors, and supporting evidence. This framework seeks to support policy reform efforts that encompass not only the integrity of examinations but also the more fundamental systemic issues of quality, equity, autonomy, and public trust in higher education systems.

Keywords: university governance; neoliberalism; quality assurance; stakeholder theory; accountability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v13_i3_26/Kumar.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eur:ejserj:488

DOI: 10.26417/899cos4a

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Social Science Education and Research from Revistia Research and Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revistia Research and Publishing ().