Enforcing Fair Lending: Evidence from Mortgage Market Litigation
Matthew Maury,
Michael Suher and
Jeffery Y. Zhang
Additional contact information
Michael Suher: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/michael-suher.htm
No 2026-012, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)
Abstract:
Does fair lending litigation impact mortgage lender decisions? Using a novel dataset of all fair lending legal actions from 1991 to 2023, we find that it does. In the wake of legal settlements for discrimination against Black borrowers, lenders significantly reduced denial rates for Black applicants. The reductions offset pre-litigation racial disparities in denial rates by litigated banks, relative to those banks' competitors. Origination rates for Black applicants also increased post-litigation. We further observe evidence of a spillover effect on the approval decisions of non-litigated banks operating in the same city as a litigated bank. Altogether, the evidence suggests that the enforcement of fair lending laws is an effective tool to reduce racial discrimination in credit markets.
Keywords: Fair lending; Mortgages; Discrimination; Consumer lending (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 59 p.
Date: 2026-02-27
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law and nep-mid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2026012pap.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:102842
DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2026.012
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().