Divest, Disregard, or Double Down?

Brigitte Roth Tran

No 2017-042, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: How much, if at all, should an endowment invest in a firm whose activities run counter to the charitable missions the endowment funds? Endowments typically disregard the objectionable nature of or divest from such firms. However, if firm returns increase with activities the endowment combats, doubling down on the investment increases expected utility by aligning funding availability with need. I call this \"mission hedging.\" This paper offers the first model that characterizes the endowment's investment decision on the objectionable firm, defines investment trade-offs, and examines related evidence. Bad actors provide good opportunities to hedge mission-specific risks.

Keywords: Socially responsible investing; Divestment; Endowment; Foundation; Philanthropy; Portfolio; Universities and colleges (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D64 G11 L31 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2017-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2017042pap.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Divest, Disregard, or Double Down? (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2017-42

DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2017.042

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().