Technology, Geopolitics, and Trade
Leo C.H. Lam () and
Ana Maria Santacreu
No 2025-029, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Abstract:
We study how geopolitical shocks reshape innovation through the contractual structure of cross-border technology adoption. Empirically, royalty flows are more sensitive than goods trade to geopolitical distance, especially where intellectual property enforcement is weak. We build a growth-trade model in which political risk raises breach hazards in licensing contracts. Firms reprice royalties but compliant adoption declines, and innovation incentives respond to the joint evolution of price and quantity. Quantitatively, fragmentation reallocates innovation and lowers the balanced-growth path growth rate. This mechanism has direct policy implications: under a consumption-only objective there is no role for export controls: Intervention arises only when governments value technological leadership in addition to efficiency.
Keywords: geopolitics; international trade; strategic rivalry; technology transfer (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F63 O14 O33 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 74 pages
Date: 2025-10-21, Revised 2026-02-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ifn and nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2025.029 Full text (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedlwp:101980
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
DOI: 10.20955/wp.2025.029
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Scott St. Louis ().